IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v30y2026i5p43-70.html

Non-performing loans and capital adequacy ratio in Vietnamese commercial banks: moderating effects of ownership structure - a dynamic GMM analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nha Thanh Nguyen

Abstract

This study examines whether non-performing loans erode the capital adequacy ratio of Vietnamese commercial banks and whether government ownership moderates this relationship. Using a panel data of 34 banks during 2010-2024, with 490 bank-year observations after screening, the study employs descriptive statistics, diagnostic tests, feasible generalised least squares for robustness, and two-step system GMM as the main estimator to address capital persistence, unobserved heterogeneity, heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation, and endogeneity. The results consistently show that non-performing loans are negatively associated with capital adequacy. In the preferred GMM model, lagged capital adequacy is positive and significant, confirming adjustment persistence; bank size and government ownership increase capital adequacy; and the interaction between non-performing loans and government ownership is negative and significant. The findings indicate that government ownership strengthens the adverse effect of credit risk on bank capital, highlighting ownership structure as a boundary condition in emerging banking markets and policy-relevant banking research debates.

Suggested Citation

  • Nha Thanh Nguyen, 2026. "Non-performing loans and capital adequacy ratio in Vietnamese commercial banks: moderating effects of ownership structure - a dynamic GMM analysis," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(5), pages 43-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:30:y:2026:i:5:p:43-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=153851
    Download Restriction: Open Access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:30:y:2026:i:5:p:43-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.