IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v26y2023i4p499-529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenging factors influencing university students' intention and experience of online learning: an analysis using Berge model

Author

Listed:
  • Azleen Ilias
  • Nasrudin Baidi
  • Erlane K. Ghani
  • Fazlida Mohd Razali

Abstract

This study examined the Malaysian university students' experience of online learning (OL) usage challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic using Berge model among gender, experience, and intention. It examined the association between experience of online learning usage and intention to use online learning. This study surveyed 436 students via an electronic questionnaire. The view on technical skills and learner motivation are different among genders. Furthermore, students with experience and those with no experience of online learning have different views on academic skills. Students that have an intention and those with no intention to use OL have different views on social interactions, academic skills, time and support for studies, cost and access and technical problems. The experience of OL usage has shown an association with intention to use OL. This study contributes to the implementation of OL that involves instructors and students and the motivation to use OL with instructors' preparedness, teaching content, time, and voice usage.

Suggested Citation

  • Azleen Ilias & Nasrudin Baidi & Erlane K. Ghani & Fazlida Mohd Razali, 2023. "Challenging factors influencing university students' intention and experience of online learning: an analysis using Berge model," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(4), pages 499-529.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:26:y:2023:i:4:p:499-529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=134856
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:26:y:2023:i:4:p:499-529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.