IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v24y2022i4p441-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monetary valuation of the amenity forest ecological conservation and management attributes in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Chin Kee Tom
  • Nitanan Koshy Matthew
  • Ahmad bin Shuib

Abstract

Incorporating users' preferences, expectations and demands when designing, planning and managing forest reserves for recreational purposes is crucial to success. This is particularly important in countries that have gazetted the forests as recreational forests for the public. This study aims to determine visitors' preferences on ecological and management recreational forest attributes, the levels of attributes and their preferences for particular forest attributes using the choice experiment method. The results indicated that visitors felt the number of workers in the park is sufficient, followed by more information boards (IB) (80% coverage) in the park being needed. Regarding facilities (IF), respondents were looking forward to seeing an improvement in up to 90% of the park's current facilities. In addition, respondents felt that park management should enhance their ecological management efforts in the park. The findings revealed in the AKRF that 83.6% of the respondents were willing to donate on ecological conservation and management. The quantity that participants were willing to donate amounted to RM44/year/family based on the random parameter logit model. The findings may assist policymakers in investigating the relationship between visitors and conservation and management in the AKRF.

Suggested Citation

  • Chin Kee Tom & Nitanan Koshy Matthew & Ahmad bin Shuib, 2022. "Monetary valuation of the amenity forest ecological conservation and management attributes in Malaysia," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(4), pages 441-470.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:24:y:2022:i:4:p:441-470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=126427
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:24:y:2022:i:4:p:441-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.