IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v21y2021i1p62-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of reputational risk impact on commercial banks financial performance

Author

Listed:
  • Daiva Jurevičienė
  • Viktorija Skvarciany
  • Ksenija Kravec

Abstract

The current study aims to determine criteria linked to a bank's reputation and evaluate the effect of reputation on the commercial bank's performance. In order to estimate the impact of reputation on a commercial bank's performance, the expert evaluation method was chosen. The research was conducted in two steps: first, the unstructured (informal) interview was applied to extract the factors; second, the multicriteria decision methods such as simple additive weighting (SAW), complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) and geometric mean were employed for evaluating the determined factors. The research results showed that the weakest position of the commercial bank in terms of reputational risk implied the performance efficiency decrease. The conducted research contribute to the scientific literature by providing a methodology for assessing the impact of reputational risk on commercial bank's performance. However, the methodology could be applied to those banks that do not provide services for individual customers but work with business clients only.

Suggested Citation

  • Daiva Jurevičienė & Viktorija Skvarciany & Ksenija Kravec, 2021. "Assessment of reputational risk impact on commercial banks financial performance," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(1), pages 62-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:62-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=112001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:62-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.