IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v16y2018i2p250-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Users' perceptions towards the quality of learning resources and services: a case study of AAU libraries

Author

Listed:
  • Raed Said
  • Abdoulaye Kaba

Abstract

This study investigates and analyses the current performance of libraries at Al Ain University of Science and Technology (AAU). The paper explores the perceptions of students and faculty members towards quality resources and services provided by AAU libraries. It uses a modified SERVPERF model for the measurement. SERVPERF model is based on five dimensions: reliability, assurance, tangibles, empathy, and responsiveness (Cronin and Taylor, 1992). Data are collected through a survey questionnaire instrument. A total of 657 students and faculty members participated in the survey. T-test and ANOVA test are used to validate four hypotheses. Participants expressed average satisfaction with the quality of resources and services provided by AAU libraries. However, the libraries achieved the highest level of satisfactions in reliability and responsiveness among faculty members. Findings of the study indicate no significant difference in perception towards quality performance of AAU libraries between male and female, and also among the respondents from different locations or different colleges. However, the results revealed statistically significant differences in perception between faculty and students towards the current performance of AAU libraries.

Suggested Citation

  • Raed Said & Abdoulaye Kaba, 2018. "Users' perceptions towards the quality of learning resources and services: a case study of AAU libraries," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(2), pages 250-262.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:16:y:2018:i:2:p:250-262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=94016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:16:y:2018:i:2:p:250-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.