IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v14y2017i3-4p237-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary economics, organisational evolution, and behavioural approach: in search of commonalities

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Piórkowska
  • Ewa StaÅ„czyk-Hugiet

Abstract

The overarching aim of the paper is to find the commonalities amongst evolutionary economics, organisational evolution, and behavioural approach and more specifically to conceptually clarify the extent to which the driving forces of organisational change can be explained by those fields. The aim has been realised through extensive literature studies and deductive referring. The key findings are as follows: 1) the separation of micro (individual) level from macro (organisational) level of analysing organisational behaviour requires a call for an integrative theory taking into account routine and non-routine organisational behaviour as the potential tool enabling an organisational change; 2) the behavioural theory of the firm seems to be well positioned to integrate constructs across levels as well as to integrate the phenomena inquired in evolutionary economics and organisational evolution fields since it stems from analysing individual decision-making along with process explanations for economically important firm decisions

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Piórkowska & Ewa StaÅ„czyk-Hugiet, 2017. "Evolutionary economics, organisational evolution, and behavioural approach: in search of commonalities," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3/4), pages 237-253.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:14:y:2017:i:3/4:p:237-253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=87489
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:14:y:2017:i:3/4:p:237-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.