IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v14y2017i2p151-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural uncertainty and policy making for a mega public project in communist China: the case of Three Gorges Dam

Author

Listed:
  • Fu-Lai Tony Yu
  • Diana S. Kwan

Abstract

As an alternative to the cost and benefit analysis adopted by scholars in neoclassical economics, this paper utilises an evolutionary approach to understand the policy making of the Three Gorges Dam project. We argue that the decision on constructing the Three Gorges project and its implementation are largely the result of the interactions of different levels of public agents and special interest groups who attempt to pursue their self-interest in the policy making process. This paper focuses on three levels of governmental interaction, namely central leadership, provincial officials and local cadres. Under uncertainty, the construction of the world's largest dam is the result of clashes in private interests, bargaining and consensus building among all levels of governments and special interest groups. The policy making process often produces an unintended consequence in which the players do not know in advance. This paper concludes that the outcome of the Three Gorges Dam today could not be known in advance.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu-Lai Tony Yu & Diana S. Kwan, 2017. "Structural uncertainty and policy making for a mega public project in communist China: the case of Three Gorges Dam," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 151-173.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:14:y:2017:i:2:p:151-173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86703
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:14:y:2017:i:2:p:151-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.