IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v12y2016i2p119-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Macroeconomic dynamics and magnitude of poverty: a comparative analysis of different regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Asma Nasim

Abstract

The poverty level in Pakistan has been increasing and despite decades after independence it is still a very critical socioeconomic issue. This study examines the effects of macroeconomic variables (GDP, inflation, unemployment, and tax revenues) on the poverty rate in Pakistan since 1974 to 2014. Moreover, this study also investigated the impact of a different regime i.e. democracy and military regime with reference to macroeconomic variables and poverty rate. The descriptive statistical analysis was carried out by using graphs and inferential statistical analysis was performed using Pearsons correlation and multiple regression analysis. The results showed that the real GDP and tax revenues have significant negative effects on the poverty rate. The inflation also showed a significant positive effect on the poverty rate, which implied that an increase in inflation hurts the poor more and leads to increased poverty. The unemployment rate showed insignificant positive impact on the poverty rate. On the aspect of influence of different regimes i.e. democracy and military rule, the results showed democracy has a negative impact on the poverty rate, implying that the democratic regimes are more favourable for poverty reduction in Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Asma Nasim, 2016. "Macroeconomic dynamics and magnitude of poverty: a comparative analysis of different regimes," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 119-135.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:12:y:2016:i:2:p:119-135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79558
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:12:y:2016:i:2:p:119-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.