IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v11y2016i2p170-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-monitoring of workplace from the administration and the Islamic religion perspectives (comparative study)

Author

Listed:
  • Eisa Rabeeh Ahmad
  • Amani Khayri Milhem

Abstract

Modern administrative studies do not consider investigating the self-monitoring concept from a religious perspective, and thus, the relationship between the concept of self-monitoring in Islam and in business administration is still unknown. The purpose of this research is to study the self-monitoring concept from an administrative perspective as well as the Islamic Religion perspective. By exploring the way in which they agree and disagree, the study can show how they can mutually benefit each other. The methodology to be used is: 1) The inductive approach of the self-monitoring concept in both perspectives taken from previous studies in the fields of definition, types, theories, implementation, as well as results and implications; 2) The analytical approach of both concepts and related theories, as well as the interpretation and analysis of religious texts; 3) The comparative approach of the relationship between the two concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Eisa Rabeeh Ahmad & Amani Khayri Milhem, 2016. "Self-monitoring of workplace from the administration and the Islamic religion perspectives (comparative study)," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 170-181.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:11:y:2016:i:2:p:170-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=75309
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:11:y:2016:i:2:p:170-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.