IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v7y2016i3p218-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-audit services, audit quality and enforcement - evidence from German enforcement examinations

Author

Listed:
  • Marius Gros

Abstract

In this paper, I use privileged data on German enforcement examinations to analyse the association between non-audit service (NAS) fees paid to the statutory auditor and audit quality or auditor independence, respectively. The results show that in the German setting for the years from 2005 to 2012, a period with already tightened regulation on NAS, there is neither a positive nor a negative significant association between NAS fees and enforcement examinations resulting in an error finding. The results do not change when controlling for the specific type of NAS as well as for abnormal NAS fees. Thus, the findings do neither provide support for the occurrence of knowledge spillovers nor do I find evidence indicating that NAS impair auditor independence. However, I find some evidence that the level of audit fees (and total fees) is positively associated with the likelihood of enforcement examinations resulting without a finding of material misstatements. In light of the observable pressure on audit fees in the German market, this is consistent with the notion that higher audit fees may signal higher audit effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius Gros, 2016. "Non-audit services, audit quality and enforcement - evidence from German enforcement examinations," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 218-249.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:7:y:2016:i:3:p:218-249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79936
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:7:y:2016:i:3:p:218-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.