IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v6y2015i1p33-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Historical inefficiencies and future potential: a critical analysis of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J. Somlo

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to briefly explore the history of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 ('FCPA'), review the literature surrounding its shortcomings and efficiencies and generate a cumulative assessment on the FCPA's efficacy in meeting its intended objectives. First, the FCPA is explored both in purpose and in scope to understand what its primary objectives are, how it intended to address these objectives and significant amendments that occurred (including the OECD). Next, a comprehensive literature review of the opponents and proponents of the FCPA are conducted to discern the principal concerns and activities that warrant inadequacies and successes. Throughout the literature review there are interpretations and analysis based on the previously published scholarly reviews. Finally, brief contemporary quantitative and qualitative data are applied to the problems and solutions identified in the literature review to assess the FPCA's current standing. The research report summarises the derived assertions of the FCPA's efficacy based on the findings from current published literature. It concludes with a brief speculation on future potentials based on the historical findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J. Somlo, 2015. "Historical inefficiencies and future potential: a critical analysis of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 33-49.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:33-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=68975
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:33-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.