IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v2y2011i4p314-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the regulations prevent the unethical behaviours in accounting profession? A philosophical approach on the case of Turkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Özbirecikli
  • Batuhan Güvemli

Abstract

This exploratory research aims to determine the unethical behaviours encountered in the accounting profession in Turkiye and evaluate them from a philosophical point of view. An in-depth interview was applied to the accounting academics and accounting-related professionals in order to obtain unethical behaviours throughout accounting process. In this study, 44 unethical behaviours creating crucial unethical consequences were determined. The fields of unethical behaviours throughout accounting process from stage of acceptance of clients to tax examination stage were also determined and shown in the form of a table. The unethical behaviours are classified in terms of three criteria: 1) accounting professionals' relations with related parties; 2) the stages of the accounting process; 3) the ethics values. The findings indicate that the ethics values 'integrity' and 'professional behaviour' are the most suffered from violations. Unethical behaviours resulting from clients have considerable dominancy in the stages of documentation and recording of transactions. Accounting professionals violating ethics values are not conscious of negative consequences of their unethical behaviours and others who could be affected by their unethical behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Özbirecikli & Batuhan Güvemli, 2011. "Can the regulations prevent the unethical behaviours in accounting profession? A philosophical approach on the case of Turkiye," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 314-334.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:2:y:2011:i:4:p:314-334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44381
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:2:y:2011:i:4:p:314-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.