IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v11y2022i2p164-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The morality of edge sorting and the indefatigability of resourceful evasion and avoidance gambits

Author

Listed:
  • Luiz Henrique De Lacerda Sanglard
  • Ana Lucia Fontes De Souza Vasconcelos
  • Liliane Cristina Segura

Abstract

Notwithstanding the harm's extent produced by the relevant avoidance method, this should not determine whether the conduct should be punished, it should be reprimanded regardless. The fact of the matter is that, even though players play according to previously established rules, abuses will eventually be committed, therefore tax authorities must possess the proper tools to deter such abusive measures. Despite that fact that taxpayers have the right to pre-tax income, this argument cannot be used as to overcome the collectivity's needs, represented by the state, for economic agents depend on the state to derive wealth. An active market, the protection of private property, a functional stock market, all that would not be possible without effective taxation. The obvious economic benefit is not the only reason why individuals and companies alike avoid and evade, that is, a sense of justice and economic inequality also influences the extent individuals comply, ultimately affecting taxpayers' and planners' behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Luiz Henrique De Lacerda Sanglard & Ana Lucia Fontes De Souza Vasconcelos & Liliane Cristina Segura, 2022. "The morality of edge sorting and the indefatigability of resourceful evasion and avoidance gambits," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 164-181.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:164-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=124150
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:164-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.