IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijdsci/v2y2017i4p273-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of classification methods in automated taxa identification of benthic macroinvertebrates

Author

Listed:
  • Henry Joutsijoki
  • Martti Juhola

Abstract

In this research, we examined the automated taxa identification of benthic macroinvertebrates. Benthic macroinvertebrates play an important role in biomonitoring. They can be used in water quality assessments. Identification of benthic macroinvertebrates is made usually by highly trained experts, but this approach has high costs and, hence, the automation of this identification process could reduce the costs and would make wider biomonitoring possible. The automated taxa identification of benthic macroinvertebrates returns to image classification. We applied altogether 11 different classification methods to the image dataset of eight taxonomic groups of benthic macroinvertebrates. Wide experimental tests were performed. The best results, around 94% accuracies, were achieved when quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), radial basis function network and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) were used. On the basis of the results, it can be said that the automated taxa identification of benthic macroinvertebrates is possible with high accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Henry Joutsijoki & Martti Juhola, 2017. "A comparison of classification methods in automated taxa identification of benthic macroinvertebrates," International Journal of Data Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 273-300.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijdsci:v:2:y:2017:i:4:p:273-300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=88101
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijdsci:v:2:y:2017:i:4:p:273-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=429 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.