IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijdsci/v1y2016i4p382-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resistant measures in assessing the adequacy of split-plot design models

Author

Listed:
  • Ikwuoche J. David
  • Osebekwin E. Asiribo
  • Hussaini G. Dikko

Abstract

This paper assesses the adequacy of model fit of the split-plot design models, that is the whole plot (WP) sub-design model with WP error and the split-plot (SP) sub-design model with SP error for comparing the effectiveness of resistant measures that use medians instead of means, resulting in a coefficient that is more resistant to outliers or extreme data points. This paper presents empirical application of four measures of model adequacy check and they are coefficient of determination (R2), modelling efficiency (MEF) statistic, prediction coefficient of determination (R2prod), and mean square error prediction (MSEP). These four measures were explored using their mean and median form. A 2(1+3) replicated two-level SP design and a 31 × 42 replicated mixed level SP design were used for computing the measures of model adequacy of fit for each WP and SP sub-design models. These measures in their median form described the predictive performance of each WP and SP sub-design models adequately.

Suggested Citation

  • Ikwuoche J. David & Osebekwin E. Asiribo & Hussaini G. Dikko, 2016. "Resistant measures in assessing the adequacy of split-plot design models," International Journal of Data Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 382-396.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijdsci:v:1:y:2016:i:4:p:382-396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=81360
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijdsci:v:1:y:2016:i:4:p:382-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=429 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.