IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijdmmm/v6y2014i2p110-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rough mereology classifier vs. simple DNA microarray gene extraction methods

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Artiemjew

Abstract

This work extends the author's contribution to the Second International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SocPar 2010) held at the University of Cergy Pontoise in December 2010. The current version is dedicated to the topic of gene separation algorithms and our best classification method based on weighted voting, which was investigated recently by Polkowski and Artiemjew. The DNA microarrays are a popular tool, useful to the research of gene expression. The exemplary application is, among others, to differentiate healthy and ill tissues, distinguishing some organisms' features or to check changes in gene expression by means of some additional factors. The huge amount of information obtained from DNA microarrays in the range of tens of thousands of genes causes many difficulties. Many algorithms, especially brute force methods, cannot be applied for this reason, and due to the low number of training objects tend to overfit. In this paper, we present two simple gene extraction methods compared by means of our best weighted voting classifier. The results of research show the high effectiveness of our approach, and full comparability with the results of the recent DNA microarray data mining competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Artiemjew, 2014. "Rough mereology classifier vs. simple DNA microarray gene extraction methods," International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 110-126.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijdmmm:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:110-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=63193
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijdmmm:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:110-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=342 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.