IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v7y2015i4p315-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Usefulness unfulfilled: a performance review of value added statements

Author

Listed:
  • G.D. Donleavy

Abstract

The opportunity to achieve a major turning point in accounting history was the publication of The Corporate in the UK in 1975. It recommended several new reports, but its recommendations were largely ignored. One of the recommended reports, however, the value added statement, has been adopted by a number of jurisdictions around the world with stakeholder accountability as a prime objective. This paper surveys the arguments for the value added statement being for the generality of statement users what the income statement and statement of financial position have for stockholders and bondholders alone. The actual use made of the statements around the world and their usefulness is then reviewed, and the reasons for a quite widespread disappointment are discussed. Finally, the paper relates the value added statement to the ruins of the labour theory of value and suggests future research to determine the contribution value added statements could make to determining the extent to which a corporation's results are the spoils of a zero sum game under oligopolistic conditions or value genuinely created for the industry or economy a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • G.D. Donleavy, 2015. "Usefulness unfulfilled: a performance review of value added statements," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 315-334.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:315-334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=72002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:315-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.