IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v7y2015i3p228-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A critical examination of the US economy: the Orange County bankruptcy case

Author

Listed:
  • Michael D'Amato

Abstract

Fiscal irresponsibility and abuses in the proper use of derivatives resulted in the largest municipal failure in US history (at the time). Orange County's fiscal stress and its resulting bankruptcy were attributed to massive financial mismanagement by the county's treasurer, and his actions caused the loss of $1.6 billion. This being said, the 1994 bankruptcy of Orange County, California was caused by a variety of additional factors. This paper provides an analysis of the bankruptcy and explores the role of Robert Citron, the county's treasurer, as well as the influence of derivatives, the presence of political pressures, and the inadequacy of accounting reporting standards and regulatory organisations. Additionally, an analysis of the contemporary misuse of financial derivatives that helped spark the 2008 global financial crisis is also presented. An overview of the role of derivatives in the 2008 crisis is included to further highlight the disastrous consequences of their misuse. Areas of emphasis include the unregulated over-the-counter (OTC) derivative market and the lack of any informative reporting standards for such instruments. The paper concludes with a review of current accounting standards regarding derivatives, namely the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael D'Amato, 2015. "A critical examination of the US economy: the Orange County bankruptcy case," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 228-246.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:7:y:2015:i:3:p:228-246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=70460
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:7:y:2015:i:3:p:228-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.