IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v5y2013i4p327-345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three '-isations': thinking with but beyond the sociological in comprehending accounting in a global context

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Arrington
  • David R. Upton

Abstract

This essay seeks to render accounting's relation to globalisation understandable in a hermeneutic rather than sociological way. We address accounting's relation to globalisation first through Bartelson's three approaches to understanding globalisation in general, approaches that he terms transference, transformation, and transcendence. We offer brief allusions to how existing critical accounting work may or may not speak to these different approaches. We then suggest that accounting's place within globalisation embeds practices and rationalities which others have referred to as 'accountingisations'. We conclude the essay with some remarks on the emancipatory potential and transcendental horizon of orienting accounting toward what we rather nervously term 'worldisations', an idea which grants the construction of meaning absolute priority in understanding global processes and account giving in ways that have little to do with the narrowly circumscribed senses of accounting that dominate the existing literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Arrington & David R. Upton, 2013. "Three '-isations': thinking with but beyond the sociological in comprehending accounting in a global context," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 327-345.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:327-345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=56652
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikidehaghani, Mona & Cortese, Corinne & Hui-Truscott, Freda, 2021. "Accounting and pastoral power in Australian disability welfare reform," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:327-345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.