IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v5y2013i2p143-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity of accounting change during corporatisation: insights from two case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Nor Aziah Abu Kasim
  • Rasid Mail

Abstract

This paper analyses the differences and/or similarities of the process of accounting change and its consequences in two corporatised public utility organisations which are expected by the government to transform themselves into self-financing, efficient and profitable organisations. The explanatory case study method, using mainly semi-structured interviews and document reviews, was adopted. Accounting change was initiated through the mechanisms of institutional isomorphism and was enacted due to intertwined legitimacy and efficiency reasons. In spite of the efficiency reason, both cases demonstrated unsuccessful transformation due to incompatible ways of thinking, internal and external constraints and the mobilisation of power and the risks in actors' relations. Both case studies similarly capture the complexity and stability of the ongoing process of accounting change during which the ingrained public service values and practices remained stable in spite of corporatisation. However, during the later stage, the leadership factor successfully promoted the use of accounting as the new organisational knowledge within one of the case organisations. Insights from these case studies show that the enactment of the so-called 'efficient' accounting system is neither deterministic nor simple, but evolves from a combination of issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Nor Aziah Abu Kasim & Rasid Mail, 2013. "Complexity of accounting change during corporatisation: insights from two case studies," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 143-155.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:143-155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=55180
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:143-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.