IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v4y2012i5-6p483-510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditing standards and the expectations gap: evidence from Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo
  • Nieves Gómez-Aguilar
  • Estibaliz Biedma-López
  • Nieves Carrera

Abstract

This article examines the impact of auditing standards intending to reduce the audit expectations gap on auditors' behaviour. Specifically, we examine whether the adoption of an auditing standard ongoing concern evaluation in Spain is associated with changes in auditors' behaviour. Our empirical results suggest that the implementation of the new standard did not impact on auditors' propensity to issue going concern opinions; on auditors' interest on maintaining their reputation; and on the influence of auditors' economic incentives. Our results indicate that the implementation of auditing standards seems not to have an impact on day-to-day auditing practices, and therefore, auditing standards related to going concern evaluation fail to reduce the expectations gap. Our results also suggest that, in spite of the differences between the regulatory framework of auditing in Spain and in Anglo-Saxon countries (e.g., degree of state intervention), the impact of such standards on auditors' behaviour are comparable.

Suggested Citation

  • Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo & Nieves Gómez-Aguilar & Estibaliz Biedma-López & Nieves Carrera, 2012. "Auditing standards and the expectations gap: evidence from Spain," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(5/6), pages 483-510.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:4:y:2012:i:5/6:p:483-510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=51462
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:4:y:2012:i:5/6:p:483-510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.