IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v14y2025i4p354-384.html

Evaluating the levels of internal audit effectiveness among commercial and manufacturing state corporations in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • James Odero
  • David Karungu Wang'ombe
  • Farida Abdul

Abstract

No organisation can refute the benefits of an effective internal audit. Organisations worldwide are making efforts to strengthen their internal auditing functions. These efforts aim to fully realise the benefits associated with effective internal audits. One such effort involves developing a scientifically validated measurement index to evaluate internal audit effectiveness. However, previous studies have demonstrated some shortcomings in this area. Previous researchers have executed existing measurement scales inadequately, failed to identify priority measures linked to internal audit stakeholders, and did not validate them. To address these gaps, we constructed an internal audit effectiveness scale. This study used fuzzy-AHP and principal component analysis (PCA) methods. Internal audit effectiveness is used as the primary measurement target. This study evaluates four dimensions: resources, organisational structures, processes, and organisational relationships. These four dimensions were used to build seven components and thirty indicators. The fuzzy-AHP and PCA methods provided important insights. For instance, among the four dimensions, internal audit processes are the least prioritised.

Suggested Citation

  • James Odero & David Karungu Wang'ombe & Farida Abdul, 2025. "Evaluating the levels of internal audit effectiveness among commercial and manufacturing state corporations in Kenya," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 354-384.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:354-384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=149509
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:354-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.