IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v14y2025i4p336-353.html

Instructional strategies to promote critical thinking skills development among accounting undergraduates – a literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Sandhiya Roy

Abstract

Accounting educators are continuously urged to implement appropriate instructional tools that encourage the development of critical thinking skills among undergraduates. This research contributes to sharing the usefulness of diverse teaching approaches, along with the limitations, to better understand which instructional tools are viewed as beneficial in encouraging accounting students to cultivate critical thinking skills. A systematic review of prior studies was undertaken at the undergraduate level within the accounting discipline. A thematic analysis of the literature revealed five instructional tools, and these include class dialogues, research engagements, field trips, case studies, and educational games. The associated challenges suggest that educators require institutional-level training and support to help them appropriately integrate the tools within their curricula. The study outlined five instructional tools however this is not an indication that the approaches to support undergraduates to hone critical thinking capabilities are restricted to these five tools. The labour market continues to become competitive and complex, and research into exploring innovative instructional tools must continue to better prepare the next generation of graduates, translating into a skilled workforce and reducing the skills gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandhiya Roy, 2025. "Instructional strategies to promote critical thinking skills development among accounting undergraduates – a literature review," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 336-353.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:336-353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=149484
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:336-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.