IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v14y2025i4p313-335.html

Enhancing audit quality: the critical role of trust in AI adoption among auditors

Author

Listed:
  • Arbia Chatmi
  • Karim Elasri
  • Jorjia Ronquillo

Abstract

This study investigates the factors influencing auditors' adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), with a focus on trust. Using a questionnaire-based methodology, responses from auditors in prominent French firms were analysed to explore motivations and barriers to AI integration. Gender and experience shape perspectives: women emphasise AI's impact on audit quality, while men focus on its technological aspects. Less experienced auditors need training on AI risks, while more experienced auditors benefit from continuous education to enhance results. Young auditors should develop critical awareness of AI limitations, and older auditors should focus on improving AI-generated outcomes. Findings reveal trust as a key factor in AI adoption, driven by concerns over errors, reliability, and confidentiality. Managerial recommendations include tailored training, enhancing AI reliability, and fostering innovation. Establishing trust through transparent communication is essential for integrating AI into auditing, ultimately improving efficiency and audit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Arbia Chatmi & Karim Elasri & Jorjia Ronquillo, 2025. "Enhancing audit quality: the critical role of trust in AI adoption among auditors," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 313-335.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:313-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=149489
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:313-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.