IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v11y2020i2p91-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does institutional intervention achieve intended outcomes? The case of a professional accountancy organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Amankwa Fosu
  • Mohammed Amidu
  • William Coffie

Abstract

The impact of donor-funded interventions has been a subject of raging controversy over the many years of donor support. This paper assesses, through the lens of resource dependence theory (RDT), the impact of donor-funded interventions on a professional accountancy organisation (PAO) and to describe how the intervention has influenced the PAO operations and activities. A qualitative research design was adopted where data were collected through a semi-structured interview with the key principal officers of the PAO. The empirical results show a general acknowledgement among the interviewees of the positive impact of the intervention on the activities of the PAO. However, the biggest challenge encountered in the implementation of the funded intervention is the counterpart funding provided by the PAO. Moreover, the level of participation by the PAO in the determination of program deliverables was not as expected. The findings of the paper have implications for future donor support to professional accountancy organisations in other developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Amankwa Fosu & Mohammed Amidu & William Coffie, 2020. "Does institutional intervention achieve intended outcomes? The case of a professional accountancy organisation," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 91-113.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:91-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=105069
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:91-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.