IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcome/v14y2024i2p197-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Might low-protein diet for chronic kidney disease patients be successful? A case study with the application of a random effects ordered probit model

Author

Listed:
  • Lara Gitto
  • Valeria Cernaro
  • Guido Gembillo
  • Alfredo Laudani
  • Daniela Metro
  • Domenico Santoro

Abstract

A low-protein diet (LPD) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients delays the natural progression towards end-stage renal disease. The identification of the factors that guarantee patients' adherence to the diet may help physicians to provide a better assistance as well as improving patients' quality of life. Fifty-one patients following a LPD were asked to assess their satisfaction with the diet, difficulties in complying with the nutritional regime and if they felt their health had improved. A random effect ordered probit model, whose dependent variable is patients' perceived health states (better, unchanged, worse) following the diet was estimated. After six months, 49% of patients stated that their conditions improved. Age, gender and number of comorbidities had an impact on the probability to report worse health conditions. The results emphasise the importance of an appropriate nutritional regime for CKD patients and signal the need to design support programs to promote adherence.

Suggested Citation

  • Lara Gitto & Valeria Cernaro & Guido Gembillo & Alfredo Laudani & Daniela Metro & Domenico Santoro, 2024. "Might low-protein diet for chronic kidney disease patients be successful? A case study with the application of a random effects ordered probit model," International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 197-213.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcome:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:197-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137901
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcome:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:197-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=311 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.