IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcome/v11y2021i3p304-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two algorithms in sign restrictions: an exploration in an empirical SVAR

Author

Listed:
  • Lance A. Fisher
  • Hyeon-seung Huh

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the key choices for the implementation of algorithms in sign restrictions are consequential for the range of accepted impulse responses in an empirical SVAR. Two algorithms in sign restrictions are considered. In one algorithm, the key choices concern the method by which an initial set of orthogonal shocks are formed and the method by which they are rotated. For this algorithm, the range of accepted responses are invariant to these choices. In the other algorithm, the key choice is the selection of the set of coefficients on the contemporaneous variables in the structural equations which are to be generated. Each selection corresponds to an ordering of the variables. For this algorithm, the range of accepted responses can be affected by the ordering of the variables in which case the algorithm is extended to loop over all variable orderings.

Suggested Citation

  • Lance A. Fisher & Hyeon-seung Huh, 2021. "Two algorithms in sign restrictions: an exploration in an empirical SVAR," International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 304-321.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcome:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:304-321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=116387
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcome:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:304-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=311 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.