IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcist/v4y2008i4p418-429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human factors in system reliability: lessons learnt from the Maeslant storm surge barrier in The Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Jos Vrancken
  • Jan Van den Berg
  • Michel Dos Santos Soares

Abstract

The Maeslant storm surge barrier in the Netherlands is an interesting case in system reliability, first because of the great effort that has been put into making its operation reliable and into assessing its reliability, and second, because it has characteristics that make reliability assessment extremely hard. From its history a number of interesting conclusions can be drawn, of which the most important one is that there is no straightforward, definitive solution to reliability, but reliability is obtained and maintained in a continuous process of improvement. Other conclusions are that humans cannot be excluded from the operation or decision-making in systems such as the Maeslant barrier, that all methods for improving system reliability are most effective when the people involved are sharply aware of each method's limitations and that a continuous, open process of consulting a variety of experts is crucial to obtain the best possible reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jos Vrancken & Jan Van den Berg & Michel Dos Santos Soares, 2008. "Human factors in system reliability: lessons learnt from the Maeslant storm surge barrier in The Netherlands," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 418-429.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:4:y:2008:i:4:p:418-429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=20160
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:4:y:2008:i:4:p:418-429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=58 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.