IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcist/v22y2026i3p243-260.html

Enhancing risk assessment of bridge construction: applying an integrated failure mode and effect analysis and analytic hierarchy process methods

Author

Listed:
  • Souad Nouri R. Dakel
  • Jose Eduardo Munive-Hernandez
  • Amir Khan

Abstract

Bridge construction projects demand a rigorous risk assessment process to ensure safety and structural integrity. Traditional risk assessment methods often operate in isolation, failing to manage risks objectively and effectively. This paper addresses this gap by integrating the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to assess risks in bridge construction projects. The proposed methodology identifies potential hazards and uses FMEA to calculate the risk priority number (RPN) for identified risks. These risks are further assessed through AHP, combining quantitative and qualitative evaluations. This approach leads to a more objective and effective risk evaluation, resulting in more reliable ranking and prioritisation of risks. By applying this novel approach, decision-making and risk mitigation strategies can be enhanced, improving the overall safety of bridge construction practices. This approach is validated with its application to the Jofra footbridge project in Libya.

Suggested Citation

  • Souad Nouri R. Dakel & Jose Eduardo Munive-Hernandez & Amir Khan, 2026. "Enhancing risk assessment of bridge construction: applying an integrated failure mode and effect analysis and analytic hierarchy process methods," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(3), pages 243-260.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:22:y:2026:i:3:p:243-260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=154741
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:22:y:2026:i:3:p:243-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=58 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.