IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcist/v1y2005i4p312-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reading vulnerability in phase portraits: an exercise in probabilistic resilience assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian V. Gheorghe
  • Dan V. Vamanu

Abstract

Within the quest for quantitative methods to assess critical infrastructure vulnerabilities, a method is proposed to assess system vulnerability in terms of probabilities that the system undergoes significant changes, or even disintegrates under progressive stress – a natural approach in, e.g., the trade of material testing. Whilst, in the context, the "system" is seen as the phase portrait of a critical process animating its structure, the stress test boils down to inducing random fluctuations of incremental amplitude in the model control parameters and observing the ensuing distortions in the process phase portraits. Three classes of distortions are monitored for the purpose of evaluating a system failure relative frequency: innocuous distortions: that preserve phase portrait topology and thereby system stability and, to some extent, its predictability and manoeuvrability; crippling distortions: that change phase portrait topology and thereby a system's stability and would, generally, severely alter predictability and manoeuvrability whilst, however, leaving the system in a bound state; catastrophic distortions: taking the system out of the realm of bound states and thereby having it disintegrated. The method is as general as the ability to define a system in terms of its processes, and the processes in terms of iterated maps, or ODE (ordinary differential equation) flows.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian V. Gheorghe & Dan V. Vamanu, 2005. "Reading vulnerability in phase portraits: an exercise in probabilistic resilience assessment," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 312-329.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:1:y:2005:i:4:p:312-329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6678
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:1:y:2005:i:4:p:312-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=58 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.