IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcist/v15y2019i3p206-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are security standards for electricity infrastructure a good choice for Europe? Evidence on cost and benefits from two case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Ragazzi
  • Alberto Stefanini

Abstract

Power system controls are vulnerable to cyber-attacks that can seriously affect and even inhibit their operation. Such attacks may affect large portions of the power system, make repair difficult and cause huge societal impact, so pressure to ensure cyber-security of control and communication systems is now strong worldwide. Several cyber-security frameworks were developed, but it is rather difficult to anticipate adoption costs and benefits, and this hampers their generalised adoption. This paper focuses on the outcome of two case studies (concerning the Italian power generation and the Polish transmission systems. The socio-economic impact of failures and the costs of standard adoption are estimated on an objective basis. It is up to public authorities to decide whether to require the adoption of security standards to operators in the electric system. The nature of public good of security underlines the necessity of public support for this operation, but we discuss the extent and the management of this support.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Ragazzi & Alberto Stefanini, 2019. "Are security standards for electricity infrastructure a good choice for Europe? Evidence on cost and benefits from two case studies," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 206-229.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:15:y:2019:i:3:p:206-229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=100425
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:15:y:2019:i:3:p:206-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=58 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.