IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcast/v1y2025i3p233-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three-way decision-making based on index threshold acquisition

Author

Listed:
  • Bingting Li
  • Yijing Wu
  • Tianhao Zhao
  • Zhihua Cui

Abstract

Currently, the fact that the equilibrium between diversity and convergence deteriorates as the count of objectives rises is now a significant barrier in the multi-objective optimisation problem. Additionally, conventional techniques for determining three-way decision thresholds rely on real-valued state-based cost loss functions that cannot handle intricate real-world scenarios. The three decisions of the index threshold are used to design a new environment-selecting technique and a multi-objective optimisation algorithm (MaOEA-TWD-IT) in this paper to address the aforementioned issues. In more detail, the convergence threshold and diversity threshold are first obtained using the index thresholds acquisition method, and then the solutions owning better diversity and convergence are chosen based on three decision-making techniques. By assessing the smallest distance between individuals and other solutions, the diversity of solutions is revealed. The solutions' convergence is quantified with the distance between the solutions and the ideal solution. Finally, the MaOEA-TWD-IT method suggested in our study also performs excellently and is able to successfully equilibrium population diversity and convergence, according to experimental results.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingting Li & Yijing Wu & Tianhao Zhao & Zhihua Cui, 2025. "Three-way decision-making based on index threshold acquisition," International Journal of Complexity in Applied Science and Technology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 233-252.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcast:v:1:y:2025:i:3:p:233-252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=145844
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcast:v:1:y:2025:i:3:p:233-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=71 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.