IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v9y2015i2p105-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of work culture between some European countries and Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Semin Paksoy
  • Tolga Genç
  • Süleyman Bilgin Kılıç

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods can be applied to social areas as well as economical and industrial areas. By using MCDM, we will obtain some social outcomes from this field. In this study, we analyse and compare some countries and Turkey in terms of specific aspects of the work culture and ethics by using the PROMETHEE method, a MCDM. The objective of the European Union (EU) is to achieve economic, politic and social integration. In this respect, work culture is an important dimension of social harmonisation and integration. Results of the study show that there are no homogenisation and harmonisation among Turkey and some of the countries considered. Turkey is distinguished from the other European countries in terms of gender and immigrant discrimination in the working life.

Suggested Citation

  • Semin Paksoy & Tolga Genç & Süleyman Bilgin Kılıç, 2015. "A comparison of work culture between some European countries and Turkey," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 105-122.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:105-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=69438
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jahja Hamdani Widjaja, 2022. "The formation of organizational culture and its managerial impact: Evidence from Indonesia Christian-Based Universities," GATR Journals jmmr295, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:105-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.