IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v18y2024i3p229-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying measurable value dimensions of information technology occupational culture and its effect on job satisfaction: a mixed method grounded theory

Author

Listed:
  • Tuğba Koç
  • Adem Akbıyık

Abstract

This study has two main aims: first, it investigates the core cultural values of the IT profession and their effects on job satisfaction. Second, it analyses the separate impact of the other two cultural levels (national and organisational) on job satisfaction. To do this, a mixed method grounded theory is conducted. Ten information technology occupational culture (ITOC) values, namely: adaptation, precision in communication, enjoyment, teamwork, 3U demands of the customers, management support, social image, group consciousness, technical jargon, and uncertainty of task limits, were investigated. Eight identified categories showed similarities with previous research; however, management support and uncertainty tasks limits emerged as unique for this study and Turkey. In the second stage, revealed cultural values were turned into measurable dimensions, and the theoretical research model was tested. Results indicated that organisational and occupational culture had a significant and positive effect on job satisfaction, whereas national culture did not. This study is an effort to reveal the predictors of IT professionals' job satisfaction and investigate ITOC values outside of the Western context countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuğba Koç & Adem Akbıyık, 2024. "Identifying measurable value dimensions of information technology occupational culture and its effect on job satisfaction: a mixed method grounded theory," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3), pages 229-267.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:18:y:2024:i:3:p:229-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=138196
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:18:y:2024:i:3:p:229-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.