IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v17y2023i1p44-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mediating effect of perceived organisational support in the relation between job stress and organisational commitment

Author

Listed:
  • Amar Kumar Mishra
  • Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay
  • Anjali Chaudhary
  • Anita Singh

Abstract

Every employee in some way or another feels stress in their job due to their interaction with innumerable strategy, structure, systems, and styles continuously and inevitably. The ongoing pandemic across the globe has created a sense of mistrust, suspicion, and insecurity among the employees in almost every sector, increasing job stress and eroding organisational commitment, especially affective one; putting the survival of organisations at stake in the long run. However, organisations that will stand with employees extending their support and succeed in making their employees perceive the organisational support will not only keep at a bay the threat of survival but eventually will be the one to grow and prosper in the future. In the present paper, the researchers have explored the relationship between job stress, perceived organisational support, and organisational commitment among employees of higher education institutions in India using cross sectional research design and found that the erosion of organisational commitment that has resulted due to job stress during the pandemic can be restored through organisational support.

Suggested Citation

  • Amar Kumar Mishra & Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay & Anjali Chaudhary & Anita Singh, 2023. "Mediating effect of perceived organisational support in the relation between job stress and organisational commitment," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 44-59.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:44-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=127718
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:44-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.