IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v16y2022i3p302-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulate and compare routing protocols for smart green systems

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Chang
  • Anusha Kamireddy
  • Qianwen Xu
  • Jie Li
  • Charalampos Psarros
  • Perk Lin Chong

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate different routing protocols and compares network protocols, including IGRP, RIP, BGP, etc. on key metrics and identified predominant routing protocols. In order to implement the comparison of different routing protocols for smart green systems (RPSGSs), a network has been deployed with a Cisco packet tracer. Furthermore, the commands related to respective routing protocols are selected and used in CLI mode to configure the network. Cisco packet tracer is used since it provides a user-friendly interface on which users can drag and drop many devices to connect together to perform the configuration. The comparative analysis results suggest that EIGRP is a suitable routing protocol for the network that uses Cisco devices and OSPF is the most efficient routing protocol that can be used to transfer the packet from source to destination. RPSGSs allow datagrams to travel in the shortest path throughout the network.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Chang & Anusha Kamireddy & Qianwen Xu & Jie Li & Charalampos Psarros & Perk Lin Chong, 2022. "Simulate and compare routing protocols for smart green systems," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(3), pages 302-329.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:16:y:2022:i:3:p:302-329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=122530
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:16:y:2022:i:3:p:302-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.