IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v16y2022i2p240-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors affecting product design process in traditional societies: a thematic content analysis of novice designers' self-reports

Author

Listed:
  • Priyanka Rai
  • Prakhar Verma
  • Abhishek Dahiya
  • Jyoti Kumar

Abstract

New product design and dissemination in traditional societies have been reported to face resistance. The cause of resistance has not been well reported in literature. Also, in general, the product design processes for traditional societies have not been sufficiently reported in literature. This paper reports findings from qualitative research with ten novice designers who had followed a product design process for a selected traditional society in India. Also, this paper reports the details of the process of design followed. Novice designers had initially immersed in the traditional environment of rural animal husbandry practices by women for about 40 hours where they participated, observed and interviewed the women. Based on the research data, the needs were identified and later studio exercises were done to develop designs for the identified needs. At the end of the product design activity, the designers were interviewed one-on-one, using a semi-structured qualitative interview protocol.

Suggested Citation

  • Priyanka Rai & Prakhar Verma & Abhishek Dahiya & Jyoti Kumar, 2022. "Factors affecting product design process in traditional societies: a thematic content analysis of novice designers' self-reports," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(2), pages 240-258.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:240-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=121176
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:240-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.