IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v13y2019i1p120-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multicriteria approach to the prioritisation of stock investment funds

Author

Listed:
  • Frederico Silva Valentim Sallum
  • Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes
  • Maria Augusta Soares Machado

Abstract

In this paper the performance of nine stock investment funds present in the Brazilian market is analysed for the period from May 2015 to April 2017. The key objective is to establish four ways to rank the funds under analysis taking into account future financial contributions and investors with different points of view. Initially the TOPSIS method is applied considering the months as criteria and this leads to producing a degree of power for each fund. By using returns of the funds the accumulated rate and volatility are determined for each fund in two periods. As a next step the degree of influence between funds is computed and the WINGS method is applied. WINGS leads to four prioritisations of the funds in order to fit to the different points of views of financial experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Frederico Silva Valentim Sallum & Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes & Maria Augusta Soares Machado, 2019. "A multicriteria approach to the prioritisation of stock investment funds," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 120-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:120-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=96378
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:120-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.