IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v12y2018i1p85-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations for avoiding commoditisation in the automotive industry - analysis of factors that enhance customisation

Author

Listed:
  • Hirotoshi Uehara
  • Atsunari Kobayashi
  • Keisuke Uenishi
  • Junji Ikeda
  • Hiroyuki Nagano
  • Shuichi Ishida

Abstract

The automotive industry has been achieving profits by creating new value through innovations while the Japanese consumer electronic industry has been suffering from low profitability due to commoditisation. To analyse the factors helping the automotive industry avoid commoditisation, this study focuses on optional parts sales as a means to provide new customer value. It conducts customer surveys to analyse customisation and the effectiveness of directly managed stores' explanations of such value. The results suggest that customers favour customisation, and that directly managed store explanations encourage a performance-oriented customer mind-set, resulting in price increases. Thus, a mechanism is established in the automotive industry where the value created is explained to customers. This mechanism then contributes to price increases. From this, there are implications on ways to avoid commoditisation: 1) create new customer value; 2) enhance customisation to provide new value; 3) establish a value communication mechanism that encourages a performance-oriented mind-set.

Suggested Citation

  • Hirotoshi Uehara & Atsunari Kobayashi & Keisuke Uenishi & Junji Ikeda & Hiroyuki Nagano & Shuichi Ishida, 2018. "Considerations for avoiding commoditisation in the automotive industry - analysis of factors that enhance customisation," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 85-105.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:85-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=88484
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:85-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.