IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpsc/v1y2009i2-3p129-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measure performance of hospitals using analytic network process (ANP)

Author

Listed:
  • Sen-Kuei Liao
  • Kuei-Lun Chang

Abstract

Healthcare organisations have been operating in a competitive environment for years. Pressures from government and competition as well as escalating costs have driven executives to search effective performance assessment systems to help them achieve their missions or improve competitiveness. The balanced scorecard (BSC), combination of both financial and non-financial perspectives and criteria, creates a more accurate performance measurement system because it offers a more complete view of a business and can lead to better business decisions. After reviewing the literatures about the BSC and interviewing the 64 executives retains 12 important criteria, including training, satisfaction, turnover, resource, safety, new service, quality, revisiting, patient satisfaction, budget, cost and revenue to construct the hierarchy for hospital performance assessment. Measuring perspectives and criteria of BSC are interrelated. Due to the interdependent relations in decision making, we apply analytic network process (ANP) that captures the outcome of dependency between the perspectives and criteria to handle such problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Sen-Kuei Liao & Kuei-Lun Chang, 2009. "Measure performance of hospitals using analytic network process (ANP)," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2/3), pages 129-143.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpsc:v:1:y:2009:i:2/3:p:129-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30638
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpsc:v:1:y:2009:i:2/3:p:129-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=341 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.