IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v9y2012i4p484-497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rationale of e-health evaluation: the case of NHS Direct

Author

Listed:
  • Hamid Alalwany
  • Sarmad Alshawi

Abstract

An important area of research is that of the evaluation of e-health services. A holistic e-health evaluation framework should address the aspects that are hampering healthcare services from embracing the full potential of information and communication technologies towards successful e-health initiatives. Towards building a holistic evaluation framework for e-health services, this paper is intended to examine the rationale of e-health evaluation, as the paper argues that this aspect should be addressed first in the development of such a framework. NHS Direct which is one of the largest e-health services in the world has been chosen to discuss and validate a set of evaluation rationales and their applicability in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamid Alalwany & Sarmad Alshawi, 2012. "The rationale of e-health evaluation: the case of NHS Direct," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 484-497.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:9:y:2012:i:4:p:484-497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=46297
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:9:y:2012:i:4:p:484-497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.