IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v52y2026i5p21-42.html

Assessing brand equity through customer reviews: a naïve Bayes classifier approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jaesun Yeom
  • JiYu Kim
  • Han-Gyun Woo

Abstract

Customer-based brand equity has been critical to gaining a competitive advantage in the marketplace. Despite the usefulness of conventional survey-based measurement, many scholars and practitioners face difficulties in comparing brand equity across brands, sectors, and products owing to the limitations of survey-based measurement. This study proposes a machine learning method to complement traditional survey-based measures. Our approach comprises four major stages: 1) extracting seed phrases from brand equity survey questionnaires; 2) identifying response sentences from customer reviews; 3) assigning scores to brand equity; 4) replicating regression models from previous empirical studies to validate our approach. Our analysis examined 65,057 vacuum cleaner customer reviews from an online e-commerce platform, (e.g., Amazon.com) representing six major brands. This paper complements traditional studies by presenting a consistent and reliable measurement methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaesun Yeom & JiYu Kim & Han-Gyun Woo, 2026. "Assessing brand equity through customer reviews: a naïve Bayes classifier approach," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 52(5), pages 21-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:52:y:2026:i:5:p:21-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=154480
    Download Restriction: Open Access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:52:y:2026:i:5:p:21-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.