IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v52y2026i2p258-279.html

Revaluating TAM theory in consumer's acceptance of technology-based banking services: a study in Indian context

Author

Listed:
  • Kamaleswar Boro

Abstract

The study examines the influence of relative advantage and perceived risk on perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PUs). The technology acceptance model (TAM) has been modified to study the moderating effect of facilitating conditions on the relationship between perceived ease of use and behavioural intention. The study findings reveal that perceived risk, and relative advantage significantly influence perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, considered antecedents of Davis' technology acceptance. It was also found that facilitating conditions moderate the relationship between perceived ease of use and behavioural intention to accept technology. Technology acceptance model is thus effective in predicting technology acceptance behavioural intention but calls for the need to incorporate more external variables that impact the antecedents PU and PEOU to provide more explanatory power.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamaleswar Boro, 2026. "Revaluating TAM theory in consumer's acceptance of technology-based banking services: a study in Indian context," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 52(2), pages 258-279.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:52:y:2026:i:2:p:258-279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=154006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:52:y:2026:i:2:p:258-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.