IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v48y2025i4p452-481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

DeLone and McLean information systems success model: a literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmoud Al-Kofahi
  • Haslinda Hassan
  • Rosli Mohamad

Abstract

The rapid advancement of information technology over the last four decades has had a considerable impact on both individuals and organisations. Hence, information systems (IS) success has become one of the most significant topics of interest among researchers and scholars. DeLone and McLean developed the IS success model to provide a complete and extended definition of IS success. The current study provides a comprehensive literature review of prior works that have utilised the model as the theoretical foundation. The analysis covers 102 scholarly articles and conference papers published between 2012 and 2021, as reported in the Scopus database. The findings of the study indicate that the IS success model and technology acceptance model are commonly used together. The weighted analysis of internal variables indicates that information quality and user satisfaction are the best predictors. Meanwhile, perceived usefulness and trust are most commonly used as external variables. The results suggest a lack of moderating and mediating variables used in past research. The results of this study add further to the accumulated existing knowledge of the IS success model, particularly in the aspect of the predictive power of each internal variable and the most frequently used external variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmoud Al-Kofahi & Haslinda Hassan & Rosli Mohamad, 2025. "DeLone and McLean information systems success model: a literature review," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 48(4), pages 452-481.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:48:y:2025:i:4:p:452-481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=145551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:48:y:2025:i:4:p:452-481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.