IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v3y2008i4p333-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated model-driven business evaluation methodology for strategic planning

Author

Listed:
  • Amy-Hui-Lan Lim
  • Chien-Sing Lee

Abstract

An Integrated Model-driven Business Evaluation (IMoBe) methodology is proposed to solve three problems. Firstly, the need to have an extensive business performance measurement framework that can pinpoint causal relationships between the organisation's current business performance and its future directions. Secondly, there should be business performance criteria that measure the organisation's workforces. Thirdly, the business performance measurement framework should be reusable to measure different dimensions of organisational workflows. Derivation and assignment of weights on criteria in selected business performance models from the model driven knowledge base is important to assist the organisation in deciding 'what should be done next'. Prior to this, organisational objectives are classified into financial, customer, internal business process and learning and growth. QFD methodology is implemented where scores are assigned to denote the degree of correlation between the organisational objectives and weighted criteria from selected business performance models. In this paper, we present IMoBe and its application to an airline company in Malaysia.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy-Hui-Lan Lim & Chien-Sing Lee, 2008. "Integrated model-driven business evaluation methodology for strategic planning," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 333-355.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:3:y:2008:i:4:p:333-355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=18037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:3:y:2008:i:4:p:333-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.