IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v35y2020i2p204-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The performance evaluation of banks using balanced scorecard, fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS techniques and the offering of solutions to performance improvement of banks

Author

Listed:
  • Negin Akbarei
  • Mostafa Vaezi Monfard
  • Elahe Sarfi

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to realise how the performance evaluation of banks using balanced scorecard and the offering of solutions to performance improvement of banks. Numbers of experts participating in the study were 30 persons who were interested in improving discussion. This research first summarised the evaluation indices synthesised from the literature relating to banking performance. Then, to screen these indices, 22 indices were selected for banking performance evaluation. Furthermore, the relative weights of the chosen evaluation indices were calculated by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy TOPSIS. As to the prioritisation of BSC's aspects, results indicated that the financial aspect or criterion stands atop the priority list followed by the criteria of customers, learning and growth and the internal process of the organisation respectively. The results obtained from fuzzy TOPSIS method indicate that private bank is more important than specialised bank and commercial bank in banking industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Negin Akbarei & Mostafa Vaezi Monfard & Elahe Sarfi, 2020. "The performance evaluation of banks using balanced scorecard, fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS techniques and the offering of solutions to performance improvement of banks," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(2), pages 204-224.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:35:y:2020:i:2:p:204-224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=110169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:35:y:2020:i:2:p:204-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.