IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v35y2020i2p111-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-analytical structural modelling of virtual communities: the case of professional and non-professional users

Author

Listed:
  • Alencar Bravo
  • Darli Rodrigues Vieira

Abstract

Currently, the factors that motivate knowledge-sharing process in a virtual community (VC) remain unclear. VCs exist in two different but similar scenarios. The first scenario involves professional virtual communities (PVCs) formed by professionals in similar areas looking to solve common problems. PVCs within a company often work to address similar problems in multiple plants and countries. The second scenario involves non-professional virtual communities (NPVCs). This study discusses some factors that affect knowledge sharing in virtual communities and compares the effects and behaviours between PVCs and NPVCs. We investigate these issues by quantitatively reviewing the available literature using meta-analytical structural equation modelling (MASEM) for both PVCs and NPVCs to evaluate the moderating effects of conventional professional knowledge-sharing methods. Although trust was established as a crucial element in both models, the factors associated with each model differed substantially. The absolute values of the correspondence of trust with self-efficacy and with knowledge sharing were lower for PVCs than for NPVCs. This research revealed the singularities of these different information systems applied to businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Alencar Bravo & Darli Rodrigues Vieira, 2020. "Meta-analytical structural modelling of virtual communities: the case of professional and non-professional users," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(2), pages 111-131.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:35:y:2020:i:2:p:111-131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=110167
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:35:y:2020:i:2:p:111-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.