IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v25y2017i1p71-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of employees' participation in communities of practice on individual, community, and organisational performance: a case study at PT PLN (Persero) Distribusi Jakarta Raya and Tangerang

Author

Listed:
  • Devi Fitrianah
  • Samuel Rizal Harahap
  • Achmad Nizar Hidayanto
  • Dina Chahyati
  • Kongkiti Phusavat

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the impact of CoP participation for individual, community, and organisation performance, and to find the types of participation providing most benefits to PT PLN (Persero) Distribusi Jakarta Raya and Tangerang. The data was collected by sending questionnaires to the employees in ten company areas, which resulted as much as 238 copies. The collected data was processed with partial least square (PLS). The result of this research showed that CoP proved to provide benefits for individuals and to the community as well as the organisation indirectly. Moreover, types of participation that provides most benefits to performance are work barrier discussion, followed by success story discussion. However, career development discussion has not been proven to give benefit to organisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Devi Fitrianah & Samuel Rizal Harahap & Achmad Nizar Hidayanto & Dina Chahyati & Kongkiti Phusavat, 2017. "Impact of employees' participation in communities of practice on individual, community, and organisational performance: a case study at PT PLN (Persero) Distribusi Jakarta Raya and Tangerang," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(1), pages 71-87.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:25:y:2017:i:1:p:71-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=83277
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:25:y:2017:i:1:p:71-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.