IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v24y2017i4p399-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee performance evaluation in institute of higher education using fuzzy AHP methods

Author

Listed:
  • Zahra Ghassabi

Abstract

Today's business executive is in a seemingly never ending search for employees who are not only high performing, but are also willing to remain and grow with the organisation (Wright, 2010). The main aim of this study was employees' performance evaluation at those institutes of higher education. The model of the study is tested on a sample of 30 experts in the Institute of Higher Education in Iran. The main instruments used for gathering the data in this study were institute of higher education records and questionnaire. In this study, personal qualities and strength, management skills, talent and aptitude sub-scales were ranked regarding to factor effective on performance evaluation of employees including personal qualities and strength, management skills, talent and aptitude by using fuzzy hierarchical analysis (FAHP). The results obtained from fuzzy AHP methods indicate that personal qualities and strength is more important than management skills, talent and aptitude. According to the talent and aptitude factor, it is concluded that subject knowledge is superior to other factors. According to personal qualities and strength scale, it is concluded that decisiveness are more important than other factors. According to management skills scale, it is concluded that time management are more important than other factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahra Ghassabi, 2017. "Employee performance evaluation in institute of higher education using fuzzy AHP methods," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(4), pages 399-422.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:24:y:2017:i:4:p:399-422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=82886
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:24:y:2017:i:4:p:399-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.