IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v24y2017i1p51-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Software as a service quality factors evaluation using analytic hierarchy process

Author

Listed:
  • Yudho Giri Sucahyo
  • Yan Yonathan Rotinsulu
  • Achmad Nizar Hidayanto
  • Devi Fitrianah
  • Kongkiti Phusavat

Abstract

The purposes of this research are to identify software as a service (SaaS) quality factors and to utilise these factors in developing a framework to evaluate the SaaS service quality given by the SaaS providers. The framework is developed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and involving ten respondents with 4-18 years experiences in SaaS field. The result of the process shows that there are 32 factors that influence the SaaS quality. These factors consist of 15 factors related to product, ten factors related to process and seven factors related to organisation. The highest priorities of each group are factors related to security, quality control, and technically competent employee for product, process, and organisation group, respectively. We also demonstrate the application of the SaaS service quality factors framework to evaluate the SaaS service quality in one of the SaaS-based human resource management application vendor.

Suggested Citation

  • Yudho Giri Sucahyo & Yan Yonathan Rotinsulu & Achmad Nizar Hidayanto & Devi Fitrianah & Kongkiti Phusavat, 2017. "Software as a service quality factors evaluation using analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(1), pages 51-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:24:y:2017:i:1:p:51-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=80945
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:24:y:2017:i:1:p:51-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.